Publications
Published in IEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering in August 2021.
Recommended Citation: R. D. Gurchiek, N. Donahue, N. M. Fiorentino, and R. S. McGinnis, “Wearables-Only Analysis of Muscle and Joint Mechanics: An EMG-Driven Approach,” IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 580–589, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2021.3102009.
Abstract: Complex sensor arrays prohibit practical deployment of existing wearables-based algorithms for free-living analysis of muscle and joint mechanics. Machine learning techniques have been proposed as a potential solution, however, they are less interpretable and generalizable when compared to physics-based techniques. Herein, we propose a hybrid method utilizing inertial sensor- and electromyography (EMG)-driven simulation of muscle contraction to characterize knee joint and muscle mechanics during walking gait. Machine learning is used only to map a subset of measured muscle excitations to a full set thereby reducing the number of required sensors. We demonstrate the utility of the approach for estimating net knee flexion moment (KFM) as well as individual muscle moment and work during the stance phase of gait across nine unimpaired subjects. Across all subjects, KFM was estimated with 0.91%BW•H RMSE and strong correlations ( r = 0.87) compared to ground truth inverse dynamics analysis. Estimates of individual muscle moments were strongly correlated ( r = 0.81–0.99) with a reference EMG-driven technique using optical motion capture and a full set of electrodes as were estimates of muscle work ( r = 0.88–0.99). Implementation of the proposed technique in the current work included instrumenting only three muscles with surface electrodes (lateral and medial gastrocnemius and vastus medialis) and both the thigh and shank segments with inertial sensors. These sensor locations permit instrumentation of a knee brace/sleeve facilitating a practically deployable mechanism for monitoring muscle and joint mechanics with performance comparable to the current state-of-the-art.
Published in Sensors (Special Issue Feature Papers in Wearables) in September 2022.
Recommended Citation: B. M. Meyer et al., “How Much Data Is Enough? A Reliable Methodology to Examine Long-Term Wearable Data Acquisition in Gait and Postural Sway,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 18, Art. no. 18, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/s22186982.
Abstract: Wearable sensors facilitate the evaluation of gait and balance impairment in the free-living environment, often with observation periods spanning weeks, months, and even years. Data supporting the minimal duration of sensor wear, which is necessary to capture representative variability in impairment measures, are needed to balance patient burden, data quality, and study cost. Prior investigations have examined the duration required for resolving a variety of movement variables (e.g., gait speed, sit-to-stand tests), but these studies use differing methodologies and have only examined a small subset of potential measures of gait and balance impairment. Notably, postural sway measures have not yet been considered in these analyses. Here, we propose a three-level framework for examining this problem. Difference testing and intra-class correlations (ICC) are used to examine the agreement in features computed from potential wear durations (levels one and two). The association between features and established patient reported outcomes at each wear duration is also considered (level three) for determining the necessary wear duration. Utilizing wearable accelerometer data continuously collected from 22 persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) for 6 weeks, this framework suggests that 2 to 3 days of monitoring may be sufficient to capture most of the variability in gait and sway; however, longer periods (e.g., 3 to 6 days) may be needed to establish strong correlations to patient-reported clinical measures. Regression analysis indicates that the required wear duration depends on both the observation frequency and variability of the measure being considered. This approach provides a framework for evaluating wear duration as one aspect of the comprehensive assessment, which is necessary to ensure that wearable sensor-based methods for capturing gait and balance impairment in the free-living environment are fit for purpose.
Figure 1. Overview of approach for wear duration analysis. Accelerometer data were collected from BioStamp nPoint® (Medidata) devices worn on the chest and bilaterally on the thighs by a sample of persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) for 6 weeks. Sensors were worn for all hours of the day during monitoring periods. A deep learning approach was used to detect bouts of walking and standing from which performance measures were extracted. Measures were analyzed through a three-stage process to determine the number of days of wear required to capture an accurate picture of impairment and its variability.
Preprint November 2022.
Recommended Citation: T. VanDyk et al., “Digital Phenotypes of Instability and Fatigue Derived from Daily Standing Transitions in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis.” TechRxiv, Nov. 21, 2022. doi: 10.36227/techrxiv.21558216.v1.
Abstract: Impairment in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) can often be attributed to symptoms of motor instability and fatigue. Symptom monitoring and queued interventions often target these symptoms. Clinical metrics are currently limited to objective physician assessments or subjective patient reported measures. Recent research has turned to wearables for improving the objectivity and temporal resolution of assessment. Our group has previously observed wearable assessment of supervised and unsupervised standing transitions to be predictive of fall-risk in PwMS. Here we extend the application of standing transition quantification to longitudinal home monitoring of symptoms. Subjects (N=23) with varying degrees of MS impairment were recruited and monitored with accelerometry for a total of ~6 weeks each. These data were processed using a deep learning activity classifier to isolate periods of standing transition from which descriptive features were extracted for analysis. Participants completed daily and biweekly assessments describing their symptoms. From these data, Canonical Correlation Analysis was used to derive digital phenotypes of MS instability and fatigue. We find these phenotypes capable of distinguishing fallers from non-fallers, and further that they demonstrate a capacity to characterize symptoms at both daily and sub-daily resolutions. These results represent promising support for future applications of wearables, which may soon augment or replace current metrics in longitudinal monitoring of PwMS.
Published in IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (early Access) in April 2023.
Recommended Citation: B. M. Meyer et al., “Chest-Based Wearables and Individualized Distributions for Assessing Postural Sway in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, pp. 1–1, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2023.3267807.
Abstract: Typical assessments of balance impairment are subjective or require data from cumbersome and expensive force platforms. Researchers have utilized lower back (sacrum) accelerometers to enable more accessible, objective measurement of postural sway for use in balance assessment. However, new sensor patches are broadly being deployed on the chest for cardiac monitoring, opening a need to determine if measurements from these devices can similarly inform balance assessment. Our aim in this work is to validate postural sway measurements from a chest accelerometer. To establish concurrent validity, we considered data from 16 persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) asked to stand on a force platform while also wearing sensor patches on the sacrum and chest. We found five (five) of 15 postural sway features derived from chest (sacrum) were significantly correlated with force platform-derived features, which is in line with prior sacrum-derived findings. Clinical significance was established using a sample of 39 PwMS who performed eyes-open, eyes-closed, and tandem standing tasks. This cohort was stratified by fall status and completed several patient-reported measures (PRM) of balance and mobility impairment. We also compared sway features derived from a single 30-second period to those derived from a one-minute period with a sliding window to create subject-specific distributions of each postural sway feature (SSD method). We find traditional computation of sway features from the chest is sensitive to changes in PRMs and task differences. Distribution characteristics from the SSD method establish additional relationships with PRMs, detect differences in more tasks, and distinguish between fall status groups. Overall, the chest was found to be a valid location to monitor postural sway and we recommend utilizing the SSD method over single-observation analyses.
